<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCMR - Ask A Scientist!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/</link>
	<description>Geoff Hutchison's personal weblog on chemistry, nanotechnology, science, books, life and software development -- in no particular order.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/?p=67#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>Solubility of methyl violet 

The methyl violets are aniline dyes which consist basically of three aniline molecules conjugated at the center and with varying degrees of methylation of the amine groups. Structures: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_violet

I want to know what is the "theoretically ideal" solvent for these molecules (we don't necessarily know which of the three configurations it is). 
From experimentation I already know that they are soluble in water, in glacial acetic acid, and in ethoxyethanol &#62; ethanol &#62; methanol. However those are just "textbook" examples of common solvents and that information is already widely know. What I am really asking is, given the choice of any solvent or combination of solvents which are liquid(s) at room temperature, what would you choose from the point of view of solubility theory? Would aniline itself be a good choice? Are there some generalizations which can be made about the solubility of the methyl violets looking at the structures and the functional groups ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solubility of methyl violet </p>
<p>The methyl violets are aniline dyes which consist basically of three aniline molecules conjugated at the center and with varying degrees of methylation of the amine groups. Structures: </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_violet" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_violet</a></p>
<p>I want to know what is the &#8220;theoretically ideal&#8221; solvent for these molecules (we don&#8217;t necessarily know which of the three configurations it is).<br />
From experimentation I already know that they are soluble in water, in glacial acetic acid, and in ethoxyethanol &gt; ethanol &gt; methanol. However those are just &#8220;textbook&#8221; examples of common solvents and that information is already widely know. What I am really asking is, given the choice of any solvent or combination of solvents which are liquid(s) at room temperature, what would you choose from the point of view of solubility theory? Would aniline itself be a good choice? Are there some generalizations which can be made about the solubility of the methyl violets looking at the structures and the functional groups ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/?p=67#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Jennifer,

Sorry for the delayed response. I'm assuming you want to know the activation barrier for 14C + O2 =&#62; CO2. I haven't seen any theoretical or experimental data on this, though I did search. There &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; activation barrier differences for hydrogen vs. deuterium, but there's probably not a significant energy difference for 14C vs. 12C, since we're talking about a 16% mass difference (while H vs. D is ~200%).

But if you want an exact difference in activation barrier, it's not hard to calculate it theoretically. Send me an e-mail if you'd like me to compute an exact number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer,</p>
<p>Sorry for the delayed response. I&#8217;m assuming you want to know the activation barrier for 14C + O2 =&gt; CO2. I haven&#8217;t seen any theoretical or experimental data on this, though I did search. There <em>are</em> activation barrier differences for hydrogen vs. deuterium, but there&#8217;s probably not a significant energy difference for 14C vs. 12C, since we&#8217;re talking about a 16% mass difference (while H vs. D is ~200%).</p>
<p>But if you want an exact difference in activation barrier, it&#8217;s not hard to calculate it theoretically. Send me an e-mail if you&#8217;d like me to compute an exact number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Samson</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Samson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/?p=67#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Was wondering what the activation energy is for a C14 atom to combine with O2? I'm not sure if the isotope distinction makes any difference, but this is in relation to a carbon-dating issue so that is why I mention it. Where could I find this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was wondering what the activation energy is for a C14 atom to combine with O2? I&#8217;m not sure if the isotope distinction makes any difference, but this is in relation to a carbon-dating issue so that is why I mention it. Where could I find this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/?p=67#comment-897</guid>
		<description>David asked about perchorate levels. I am, by no means, an expert on toxicology or environmental impact -- so it's hard for me to speak authoritatively. I suspect a variety of chemists at Williams have also spoken about the relevance of perchlorates to Williamstown.

Perchlorate is a chemical species (a complex anion) used for a variety of chemical reactions, analyses, some fertilizers, but mostly in rocket fuels and explosives. (Perchlorate solids can decompose explosively.) There is some concern about concentrations of perchlorates in food and water -- largely because it can interfere with the uptake of iodine into the thyroid. The exact level of concern has been difficult to establish, which is why there are few exposure limits.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In February 2005, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established its official reference dose of perchlorate at 0.0007 milligrams per kilogram per day, and translated that number to a Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) of 24.5 parts per billion (ppb). This level is consistent with the recommended reference dose included in the National Academy of Sciences' ("NAS" or "NAS Committee") January 2005 report on the health implications of perchlorate.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(I suspect none of that is particularly news to David, but I felt I should answer his question. He had some other remark, but I suspect it was meant as a rhetorical question and so I will not address it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David asked about perchorate levels. I am, by no means, an expert on toxicology or environmental impact &#8212; so it&#8217;s hard for me to speak authoritatively. I suspect a variety of chemists at Williams have also spoken about the relevance of perchlorates to Williamstown.</p>
<p>Perchlorate is a chemical species (a complex anion) used for a variety of chemical reactions, analyses, some fertilizers, but mostly in rocket fuels and explosives. (Perchlorate solids can decompose explosively.) There is some concern about concentrations of perchlorates in food and water &#8212; largely because it can interfere with the uptake of iodine into the thyroid. The exact level of concern has been difficult to establish, which is why there are few exposure limits.</p>
<blockquote><p>
In February 2005, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established its official reference dose of perchlorate at 0.0007 milligrams per kilogram per day, and translated that number to a Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) of 24.5 parts per billion (ppb). This level is consistent with the recommended reference dose included in the National Academy of Sciences&#8217; (&#8221;NAS&#8221; or &#8220;NAS Committee&#8221;) January 2005 report on the health implications of perchlorate.
</p></blockquote>
<p>(I suspect none of that is particularly news to David, but I felt I should answer his question. He had some other remark, but I suspect it was meant as a rhetorical question and so I will not address it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EphBlog</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/08/15/ccmr-ask-a-scientist/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>EphBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/?p=67#comment-750</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ask a Chemist&lt;/strong&gt;

Geoff Hutchison '99 is answering chemisty questions for the local paper in Ithaca. He offers to answer ours as well. Do you have any questions for Geoff? Here are mine: 1) Is percholate really that dangerous? 2) Are you as...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ask a Chemist</strong></p>
<p>Geoff Hutchison &#8216;99 is answering chemisty questions for the local paper in Ithaca. He offers to answer ours as well. Do you have any questions for Geoff? Here are mine: 1) Is percholate really that dangerous? 2) Are you as&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
