<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pros and Cons of Open Source Chemistry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/03/20/pros-and-cons-of-open-source-chemistry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/03/20/pros-and-cons-of-open-source-chemistry/</link>
	<description>Geoff Hutchison's personal weblog on chemistry, nanotechnology, science, books, life and software development -- in no particular order.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.2-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Blue Obelisk Movement &#187; geoff hutchison: blog</title>
		<link>http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/03/20/pros-and-cons-of-open-source-chemistry/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blue Obelisk Movement &#187; geoff hutchison: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoffhutchison.net/blog/archives/2005/03/20/pros-and-cons-of-open-source-chemistry/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>[...] The Blue Obelisk Movement now has an official website, mailing list, and is moving towards sharing data and algorithms. After years of mostly proprietary code, balanced with scattered code sharing among groups, open source chemistry is becoming more organized. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Blue Obelisk Movement now has an official website, mailing list, and is moving towards sharing data and algorithms. After years of mostly proprietary code, balanced with scattered code sharing among groups, open source chemistry is becoming more organized. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
